
Ipamorelin vs Hexarelin
Clean GHRP vs potent GHRP, and why "stronger" is not always better
Ipamorelin
A selective ghrelin-receptor agonist that triggers a GH pulse without raising cortisol or prolactin. The property that made it the default GHRP and pushed the older, dirtier GHRPs to the margins.
Best for
Best for long cycles (12+ weeks). No cortisol or prolactin lift; the receptor stays sensitive longer.
Read full pageHexarelin
The most potent GHRP per microgram. And the one that desensitises fastest. A short-cycle tool, not a long-term protocol, with a cortisol lift that Ipamorelin avoids.
Best for
Best for short, intense recovery sprints (max 6 weeks). Bigger GH pulse, but receptor desensitises faster and cortisol creeps up.
Read full pageKey difference
Hexarelin is roughly 3x more potent per dose but is not selective. It bumps cortisol and prolactin. Ipamorelin is the cleaner tool for anyone running a long protocol.
Evidence quality
Ipamorelin
Limited human dataOriginal pharmacology work by Raun and colleagues (1998) established the GH-selectivity profile. The absence of cortisol and prolactin lift is what differentiates this peptide from the older GHRPs and the data on that point is reproducible. Long-term outcome trials in healthy adults are not the literature's strong suit. The pulse pharmacology is tight; the chronic body-recomp evidence is anecdotal-plus-mechanism rather than RCT-based.
Hexarelin
Limited human dataMultiple short clinical pharmacology studies from the 1990s, including the canonical Imbimbo and colleagues work, characterise the GH pulse, the cortisol/prolactin lift, and the desensitisation kinetics. The cardioprotective signal through CD36 is mostly animal data. No long-term outcome trials in healthy adults. Use it for the short-cycle pharmacology it was studied for; the chronic-use evidence base does not exist.
Not sure which one fits? Open both full pages and read the contraindications first. They are usually the deciding factor.